NoEinstein wrote:

> On Sep 22, 4:18 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:55:50 -0400, "Spaceman"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>><space...***yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
>>
>>>doug wrote:
>>>
>>>>Spaceman wrote:
>>
>>>>>doug wrote:
>>
>>>>>>There is a century of evidence. However, you just put your fingers
>>>>>>in your ears and refuse to listen. GPS etc are daily verifications
>>>>>>of relativity but you either lie about what they are doing or claim
>>>>>>the other experimenters are lying. There is no use in giving you
>>>>>>the evidence you could look up for yourself. You refuse to give up
>>>>>>your dreams.
>>
>>>>>GPS is evidence of it being wrong about "time changing" dingleberry.
>>>>>Too bad you are too brainwashed and stupid to get such a fact.
>>>>>LOL
>>
>>>>Since GPS works perfectly, your clock theory must exactly reproduce
>>>>relativity. In which case it is the same thing so you really should
>>>>support relativity.
>>
>>>Silly doug.
>>>He still does not get that all the math that supports time dilation
>>>supports the clock malfunction theory and yet he is still too stupid
>>>to realize that the physical cause is the clock malfunction, not
>>>"time changing rate".
>>>Silly Doug thinks decays rates are absolutes, even though a silly
>>>atomic clock in motion proves they are not.
>>>How stupid can Doug be.
>>>If decay rates were truly absolutes, they would not change from
>>>acceleration nor g-potential differences.
>>>Doug is a brainwashed moron that can not grasp the most simple
>>>facts about experimental data.
>>>LOL
>>
>>Silly Doug has never contrbuted one word of science to this NG.
>>He is a poor lifelong loser.
>>

I would not be so hasty with that characterization. You would have
to make the judgement about yourself since all you have tried to
contribute is a fake degree and your lying about science.


>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>>
>>www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>>
>>Einstein: the greatest hoaxer since virgin mary- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -
>
>
> —— NoEinstein ——

Spaceman wrote:

> doug wrote:
>
>>You have demonstrated that you have no clue how atomic clocks work
>>even when PD gave you a nice summary article that used words of
>>one syllable or less. You still could not understand any of it.
>
>
> Still don't understand the word resonance huh?
> LOL
>
You certainly have demonstrated you do not.
How are doing doing learning what resonance width means?
You were not doing very well on that. You could actually
look it up on google when you learn how.

>