Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:06:39 -0800, doug <xx***xx.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:27:31 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinstein***bellsouth.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sep 18, 11:50 pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>NoEinstein wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Dear Henri: Those who are 100% sure, probably aren't being objective
>>>>in the analysis. —— NoEinstein ——
>>>
>>>
>>>Every experiment that is supposed to support Einstein's relativity has an
>>>alternative Newtonian solution.
>>>
>>>
>>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>>>
>>>www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>>>
>>>Einstein: greatest hoaxer since virgin mary
>>
>>Except of course those experiments which refute the ballistic theory you
>>love but cannot support.
>
>
> Name one, idiot....
>
GPS etc. But you are not connected to reality in any way. You are not
a doctor, you are not a Henri and you are not a Wilson. Your
"scientific" views have just as much validity.

>
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> Einstein: greatest hoaxer since virgin mary

Spaceman wrote:

> doug wrote:
>
>>There is a century of evidence. However, you just put your fingers in
>>your ears and refuse to listen. GPS etc are daily verifications of
>>relativity but you either lie about what they are doing or claim the
>>other experimenters are lying. There is no use in giving you the
>>evidence you could look up for yourself. You refuse to give up
>>your dreams.
>
>
> GPS is evidence of it being wrong about "time changing" dingleberry.
> Too bad you are too brainwashed and stupid to get such a fact.
> LOL
>

Since GPS works perfectly, your clock theory must exactly reproduce
relativity. In which case it is the same thing so you really should
support relativity.

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:55:50 -0400, "Spaceman"
<spaceman***yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:

>doug wrote:
>> Spaceman wrote:
>>
>>> doug wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is a century of evidence. However, you just put your fingers
>>>> in your ears and refuse to listen. GPS etc are daily verifications
>>>> of relativity but you either lie about what they are doing or claim
>>>> the other experimenters are lying. There is no use in giving you
>>>> the evidence you could look up for yourself. You refuse to give up
>>>> your dreams.
>>>
>>>
>>> GPS is evidence of it being wrong about "time changing" dingleberry.
>>> Too bad you are too brainwashed and stupid to get such a fact.
>>> LOL
>>>
>>
>> Since GPS works perfectly, your clock theory must exactly reproduce
>> relativity. In which case it is the same thing so you really should
>> support relativity.
>
>Silly doug.
>He still does not get that all the math that supports time dilation
>supports the clock malfunction theory and yet he is still too stupid
>to realize that the physical cause is the clock malfunction, not
>"time changing rate".
>Silly Doug thinks decays rates are absolutes, even though a silly
>atomic clock in motion proves they are not.
>How stupid can Doug be.
>If decay rates were truly absolutes, they would not change from
>acceleration nor g-potential differences.
>Doug is a brainwashed moron that can not grasp the most simple
>facts about experimental data.
>LOL
>

Silly Doug has never contrbuted one word of science to this NG.
He is a poor lifelong loser.


Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.

Einstein: the greatest hoaxer since virgin mary

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:11:49 -0800, doug <xx***xx.com> wrote:

>
>
>Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:06:39 -0800, doug <xx***xx.com> wrote:

>>>Except of course those experiments which refute the ballistic theory you
>>>love but cannot support.
>>
>>
>> Name one, idiot....
>>
>GPS etc. But you are not connected to reality in any way. You are not
>a doctor, you are not a Henri and you are not a Wilson. Your
>"scientific" views have just as much validity.

What about all my publications?




Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.

Einstein: the greatest hoaxer since virgin mary

PD wrote:

> On Sep 22, 3:21 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:11:49 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>>
>>>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:06:39 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Except of course those experiments which refute the ballistic theory you
>>>>>love but cannot support.
>>
>>>>Name one, idiot....
>>
>>>GPS etc. But you are not connected to reality in any way. You are not
>>>a doctor, you are not a Henri and you are not a Wilson. Your
>>>"scientific" views have just as much validity.
>>
>>What about all my publications?
>
>
> Which ones would those be?

Probably is going to do some with George Hammond.
>
>
>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>>
>>www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>>
>>Einstein: the greatest hoaxer since virgin mary
>
>

Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:

> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:11:49 -0800, doug <xx***xx.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:06:39 -0800, doug <xx***xx.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>>Except of course those experiments which refute the ballistic theory you
>>>>love but cannot support.
>>>
>>>
>>>Name one, idiot....
>>>
>>
>>GPS etc. But you are not connected to reality in any way. You are not
>>a doctor, you are not a Henri and you are not a Wilson. Your
>>"scientific" views have just as much validity.
>
>
> What about all my publications?
>
You have no scientific publications since it is clear to the
entire world that you have made no contribution. You like to
bluster but that does not substitute for knowledge. You
keep claiming relativity does not work but it works just fine
for the world and it does not care what you think. You
keep making silly claims which show that you have no idea
how the GPS works or how the clocks are designed because
otherwise you have to admit that you have contributed nothing.
But what you have done is still nothing.

>
>
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> Einstein: the greatest hoaxer since virgin mary

On Sep 22, 12:11***am, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
> Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:06:39 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>
> >>Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>
> >>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:27:31 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> >>>wrote:
>
> >>>>On Sep 18, 11:50 pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >>>>>On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>>>Dear Henri: ***Those who are 100% sure, probably aren't being objective
> >>>>in the analysis. ***—— NoEinstein ——
>
> >>>Every experiment that is supposed to support Einstein's relativity hasan
> >>>alternative Newtonian solution.
>
> >>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> >>>www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> >>>Einstein: greatest hoaxer since virgin mary
>
> >>Except of course those experiments which refute the ballistic theory you
> >>love but cannot support.
>
> > Name one, idiot....
>
> GPS etc. But you are not connected to reality in any way. ***You are not
> a doctor, you are not a Henri and you are not a Wilson. ***Your
> "scientific" views have just as much validity.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> >www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> > Einstein: greatest hoaxer since virgin mary- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

> Dear Doug: You are a persona non grata who contributes nothing and is
> nothing. —— NoEinstein ——

On Sep 22, 4:18***am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:55:50 -0400, "Spaceman"
>
>
>
>
>
> <space...***yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
> >doug wrote:
> >> Spaceman wrote:
>
> >>> doug wrote:
>
> >>>> There is a century of evidence. However, you just put your fingers
> >>>> in your ears and refuse to listen. ***GPS etc are daily verifications
> >>>> of relativity but you either lie about what they are doing or claim
> >>>> the other experimenters are lying. ***There is no use in giving you
> >>>> the evidence you could look up for yourself. ***You refuse to give up
> >>>> your dreams.
>
> >>> GPS is evidence of it being wrong about "time changing" dingleberry.
> >>> Too bad you are too brainwashed and stupid to get such a fact.
> >>> LOL
>
> >> Since GPS works perfectly, your clock theory must exactly reproduce
> >> relativity. In which case it is the same thing so you really should
> >> support relativity.
>
> >Silly doug.
> >He still does not get that all the math that supports time dilation
> >supports the clock malfunction theory and yet he is still too stupid
> >to realize that the physical cause is the clock malfunction, not
> >"time changing rate".
> >Silly Doug thinks decays rates are absolutes, even though a silly
> >atomic clock in motion proves they are not.
> >How stupid can Doug be.
> >If decay rates were truly absolutes, they would not change from
> >acceleration nor g-potential differences.
> >Doug is a brainwashed moron that can not grasp the most simple
> >facts about experimental data.
> >LOL
>
> Silly Doug has never contrbuted one word of science to this NG.
> He is a poor lifelong loser.
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> Einstein: the greatest hoaxer since virgin mary- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

—— NoEinstein ——

On Sep 22, 4:21***am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:55:20 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Sep 20, 9:24***pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:27:31 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Sep 18, 11:50***pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >NoEinstein wrote:
> >> >Dear Henri: ***Those who are 100% sure, probably aren't being objective
> >> >in the analysis. ***—— NoEinstein ——
>
> >> Every experiment that is supposed to support Einstein's relativity hasan
> >> alternative Newtonian solution.
>
> >> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> >>www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> >> Einstein: greatest hoaxer since virgin mary
>
> >Dear Henri: ***Einstein was very jealous of Newton, a true scientist.
> >When Einstein learned from an astronomer friend about how Newton's
> >physics wasn't explaining the precession of Mercury's orbit; and when
> >he learned from that same friend that the moons of Jupiter appear
> >sooner than the orbital periods predict, Einstein set out to make a
> >correction to Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. ***Since Einstein
> >knew how much the deviations were, he modified the formulas until they
> >would make corrections that... "fit". ***He called that is GR theory.
> >But he had no idea what gravity was, just that it, essentially, obeyed
> >the inverse square law. ***Bodies that remain at a fixed orbital
> >distance don't "need" GR to predict where and when.
> > *** *** My own "theory" is that the ether density and flow near dense
> >objects obeys the inverse square law, too. ***So, the effects of
> >traveling through that ether at varying center to center distances
> >will yield velocity changes from the real cause, not for Einstein's
> >analogous cause. ***Einstein had no idea what gravity is. ***I KNOW what
> >gravity is! ***—— NoEinstein ——
>
> .....give it up Nilbrain. There is NO UNIVERSAL AETHER. TRUE relativity is here
> to stay.
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> Einstein: the greatest hoaxer since virgin mary- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dear Henri: Being partly right about physics won't cut it. It's all
or nothing. Perhaps you should develop an open mind, or give-it-up,
yourself. —— NoEinstein ——

NoEinstein wrote:
> On Sep 22, 4:21 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:55:20 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Sep 20, 9:24 pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:27:31 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
>>>>wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Sep 18, 11:50 pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>NoEinstein wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Dear Henri: Those who are 100% sure, probably aren't being objective
>>>>>in the analysis. —— NoEinstein ——
>>
>>>>Every experiment that is supposed to support Einstein's relativity has an
>>>>alternative Newtonian solution.
>>
>>>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>>
>>>>www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>>
>>>>Einstein: greatest hoaxer since virgin mary
>>
>>>Dear Henri: Einstein was very jealous of Newton, a true scientist.
>>>When Einstein learned from an astronomer friend about how Newton's
>>>physics wasn't explaining the precession of Mercury's orbit; and when
>>>he learned from that same friend that the moons of Jupiter appear
>>>sooner than the orbital periods predict, Einstein set out to make a
>>>correction to Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. Since Einstein
>>>knew how much the deviations were, he modified the formulas until they
>>>would make corrections that... "fit". He called that is GR theory.
>>>But he had no idea what gravity was, just that it, essentially, obeyed
>>>the inverse square law. Bodies that remain at a fixed orbital
>>>distance don't "need" GR to predict where and when.
>>> My own "theory" is that the ether density and flow near dense
>>>objects obeys the inverse square law, too. So, the effects of
>>>traveling through that ether at varying center to center distances
>>>will yield velocity changes from the real cause, not for Einstein's
>>>analogous cause. Einstein had no idea what gravity is. I KNOW what
>>>gravity is! —— NoEinstein ——
>>
>>.....give it up Nilbrain. There is NO UNIVERSAL AETHER. TRUE relativity is here
>>to stay.
>>
>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>>
>>www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>>
>>Einstein: the greatest hoaxer since virgin mary- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -
>
>
> Dear Henri: Being partly right about physics won't cut it. It's all
> or nothing. Perhaps you should develop an open mind, or give-it-up,
> yourself. —— NoEinstein ——

It is always good to see the cranks fight.

doug wrote:
> You have demonstrated that you have no clue how atomic clocks work
> even when PD gave you a nice summary article that used words of
> one syllable or less. You still could not understand any of it.

Still don't understand the word resonance huh?
LOL

Spaceman wrote:

> doug wrote:
>
>>Spaceman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>doug wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>There is a century of evidence. However, you just put your fingers
>>>>in your ears and refuse to listen. GPS etc are daily verifications
>>>>of relativity but you either lie about what they are doing or claim
>>>>the other experimenters are lying. There is no use in giving you
>>>>the evidence you could look up for yourself. You refuse to give up
>>>>your dreams.
>>>
>>>
>>>GPS is evidence of it being wrong about "time changing" dingleberry.
>>>Too bad you are too brainwashed and stupid to get such a fact.
>>>LOL
>>>
>>
>>Since GPS works perfectly, your clock theory must exactly reproduce
>>relativity. In which case it is the same thing so you really should
>>support relativity.
>
>
> Silly doug.
> He still does not get that all the math that supports time dilation
> supports the clock malfunction theory and yet he is still too stupid
> to realize that the physical cause is the clock malfunction, not
> "time changing rate".
> Silly Doug thinks decays rates are absolutes, even though a silly
> atomic clock in motion proves they are not.

You have demonstrated that you have no clue how atomic clocks work
even when PD gave you a nice summary article that used words of
one syllable or less. You still could not understand any of it.


> How stupid can Doug be.
> If decay rates were truly absolutes, they would not change from
> acceleration nor g-potential differences.
> Doug is a brainwashed moron that can not grasp the most simple
> facts about experimental data.
> LOL

Which one of us is the tire changer?

>
>