On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:13:35 -0800, doug <xx***xx.com> wrote:

>
>
>Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:19:20 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFamily***gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>

>>>To Henri, science is deciding what name you'd like to be called.
>>
>>
>> At least aether theory would work if an aether existed. SR is self refuting in
>> many ways.
>>
>>
>You not liking it is not in any way a self refutation.
>It has not been shown to make wrong predictions even though you
>seem to believe that the world has been lying for a hundred years.

There is absolutely NO evidence in support of SR.



Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.

On Sep 18, 8:26***pm, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
> NoEinstein wrote:
> > On Sep 18, 12:18 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >>On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:48:27 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> >>wrote:
>
> >>>On Sep 17, 2:25 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >>>>On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:45:47 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> >>>>wrote:
>
> >>>Dear Henri: ***If you won't "try" to explain gravity, would you at least
> >>>be open-minded enough to consider my explanation that gravity is just
> >>>ether flowing down toward the Earth to replace the ether being lost by
> >>>radiation into space? ***—— NoEinstein ——
>
> >>There ain't no aether.
> >>One plausible explanation is 'shielding theory'. It generates an inverse square
> >>law....but we don't know of any particles that might be involved.
>
> >>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> >>There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.
>
> > Dear Henri: ***I've got you pegged: To your credit, you've tried very
> > hard to understand what is going on in nature. ***But you've tried so
> > hard that when I came along with simple explanations that fit, your
> > ego is just too hurt, because you didn't see things that are so
> > simple, yourself. ***The state of physics, today, is 90% ego, and 10%
> > truths——just like your understanding of what's what in Nature. ***——
> > NoEinstein ——
>
> No, you are 100% ego and 0% truth.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dear Doug: You are a persona non grata who contributes nothing and is
nothing. —— NoEinstein ——

On Sep 18, 11:50***pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>
> >NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >> On Sep 18, 12:18 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >>>On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:48:27 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> >>>wrote:
>
> >>>>On Sep 17, 2:25 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >>>>>On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:45:47 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> >>>>>wrote:
>
> >>>>Dear Henri: ***If you won't "try" to explain gravity, would you at least
> >>>>be open-minded enough to consider my explanation that gravity is just
> >>>>ether flowing down toward the Earth to replace the ether being lost by
> >>>>radiation into space? ***—— NoEinstein ——
>
> >>>There ain't no aether.
> >>>One plausible explanation is 'shielding theory'. It generates an inverse square
> >>>law....but we don't know of any particles that might be involved.
>
> >>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> >>>There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.
>
> >> Dear Henri: ***I've got you pegged: To your credit, you've tried very
> >> hard to understand what is going on in nature. ***But you've tried so
> >> hard that when I came along with simple explanations that fit, your
> >> ego is just too hurt, because you didn't see things that are so
> >> simple, yourself. ***The state of physics, today, is 90% ego, and 10%
> >> truths——just like your understanding of what's what in Nature. ***——
> >> NoEinstein ——
>
> >No, you are 100% ego and 0% truth.
>
> He's an aetherist...but that's better than being an Einstein worshipper.
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dear Henri: Those who are 100% sure, probably aren't being objective
in the analysis. —— NoEinstein ——

On Sep 19, 1:06***am, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
> Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>
> >>NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>>On Sep 18, 12:18 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >>>>On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:48:27 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> >>>>wrote:
>
> >>>>>On Sep 17, 2:25 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >>>>>>On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:45:47 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> >>>>>>wrote:
>
> >>>>>Dear Henri: ***If you won't "try" to explain gravity, would you at least
> >>>>>be open-minded enough to consider my explanation that gravity is just
> >>>>>ether flowing down toward the Earth to replace the ether being lost by
> >>>>>radiation into space? ***—— NoEinstein ——
>
> >>>>There ain't no aether.
> >>>>One plausible explanation is 'shielding theory'. It generates an inverse square
> >>>>law....but we don't know of any particles that might be involved.
>
> >>>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> >>>>There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.
>
> >>>Dear Henri: ***I've got you pegged: To your credit, you've tried very
> >>>hard to understand what is going on in nature. ***But you've tried so
> >>>hard that when I came along with simple explanations that fit, your
> >>>ego is just too hurt, because you didn't see things that are so
> >>>simple, yourself. ***The state of physics, today, is 90% ego, and 10%
> >>>truths——just like your understanding of what's what in Nature. ***——
> >>>NoEinstein ——
>
> >>No, you are 100% ego and 0% truth.
>
> > He's an aetherist...but that's better than being an Einstein worshipper..
>
> I enjoy the truth, you enjoy your fantasies about doing something
> important. You are good for some entertainment and for occasional
> humor to show how people can misunderstand science. ***But you are not
> going to change or learn about science, so enjoy your delusions.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> >www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> > There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Folks: Doug is a persona non grata. —— NoEinstein ——

On Sep 19, 6:03***pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:19:20 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFam...***gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 18, 10:50***pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> >> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>
> >> >NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >> >> On Sep 18, 12:18 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >> >>>On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:48:27 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> >> >>>wrote:
>
> >> >>>>On Sep 17, 2:25 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:45:47 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> >> >>>>>wrote:
>
> >> >>>>Dear Henri: ***If you won't "try" to explain gravity, would you atleast
> >> >>>>be open-minded enough to consider my explanation that gravity is just
> >> >>>>ether flowing down toward the Earth to replace the ether being lost by
> >> >>>>radiation into space? ***—— NoEinstein ——
>
> >> >>>There ain't no aether.
> >> >>>One plausible explanation is 'shielding theory'. It generates an inverse square
> >> >>>law....but we don't know of any particles that might be involved.
>
> >> >>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> >> >>>There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.
>
> >> >> Dear Henri: ***I've got you pegged: To your credit, you've tried very
> >> >> hard to understand what is going on in nature. ***But you've tried so
> >> >> hard that when I came along with simple explanations that fit, your
> >> >> ego is just too hurt, because you didn't see things that are so
> >> >> simple, yourself. ***The state of physics, today, is 90% ego, and 10%
> >> >> truths——just like your understanding of what's what in Nature. ***——
> >> >> NoEinstein ——
>
> >> >No, you are 100% ego and 0% truth.
>
> >> He's an aetherist...but that's better than being an Einstein worshipper.
>
> >To Henri, science is deciding what name you'd like to be called.
>
> At least aether theory would work if an aether existed. SR is self refuting in
> many ways.
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dear Henri: Such as violating the Law of the Conservation of Energy.
—— NoEinstein ——

NoEinstein wrote:

> On Sep 19, 1:06 am, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>
>>Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>NoEinstein wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Sep 18, 12:18 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:48:27 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>On Sep 17, 2:25 am, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:45:47 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>Dear Henri: If you won't "try" to explain gravity, would you at least
>>>>>>>be open-minded enough to consider my explanation that gravity is just
>>>>>>>ether flowing down toward the Earth to replace the ether being lost by
>>>>>>>radiation into space? —— NoEinstein ——
>>
>>>>>>There ain't no aether.
>>>>>>One plausible explanation is 'shielding theory'. It generates an inverse square
>>>>>>law....but we don't know of any particles that might be involved.
>>
>>>>>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>>
>>>>>>There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.
>>
>>>>>Dear Henri: I've got you pegged: To your credit, you've tried very
>>>>>hard to understand what is going on in nature. But you've tried so
>>>>>hard that when I came along with simple explanations that fit, your
>>>>>ego is just too hurt, because you didn't see things that are so
>>>>>simple, yourself. The state of physics, today, is 90% ego, and 10%
>>>>>truths——just like your understanding of what's what in Nature. ——
>>>>>NoEinstein ——
>>
>>>>No, you are 100% ego and 0% truth.
>>
>>>He's an aetherist...but that's better than being an Einstein worshipper.
>>
>>I enjoy the truth, you enjoy your fantasies about doing something
>>important. You are good for some entertainment and for occasional
>>humor to show how people can misunderstand science. But you are not
>>going to change or learn about science, so enjoy your delusions.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>>
>>>www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>>
>>>There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -
>
>
> Folks: Doug is a persona non grata. —— NoEinstein ——

So you still want to enjoy your fantasies and ignore the truth?

Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:27:31 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinstein***bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>On Sep 18, 11:50 pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>>Dear Henri: Those who are 100% sure, probably aren't being objective
>>in the analysis. —— NoEinstein ——
>
>
> Every experiment that is supposed to support Einstein's relativity has an
> alternative Newtonian solution.
>
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> Einstein: greatest hoaxer since virgin mary

Except of course those experiments which refute the ballistic theory you
love but cannot support.

On Sep 20, 9:24***pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:27:31 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Sep 18, 11:50***pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> >> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>
> >> >NoEinstein wrote:
> >Dear Henri: ***Those who are 100% sure, probably aren't being objective
> >in the analysis. ***—— NoEinstein ——
>
> Every experiment that is supposed to support Einstein's relativity has an
> alternative Newtonian solution.
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> Einstein: greatest hoaxer since virgin mary

Dear Henri: Einstein was very jealous of Newton, a true scientist.
When Einstein learned from an astronomer friend about how Newton's
physics wasn't explaining the precession of Mercury's orbit; and when
he learned from that same friend that the moons of Jupiter appear
sooner than the orbital periods predict, Einstein set out to make a
correction to Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. Since Einstein
knew how much the deviations were, he modified the formulas until they
would make corrections that... "fit". He called that is GR theory.
But he had no idea what gravity was, just that it, essentially, obeyed
the inverse square law. Bodies that remain at a fixed orbital
distance don't "need" GR to predict where and when.
My own "theory" is that the ether density and flow near dense
objects obeys the inverse square law, too. So, the effects of
traveling through that ether at varying center to center distances
will yield velocity changes from the real cause, not for Einstein's
analogous cause. Einstein had no idea what gravity is. I KNOW what
gravity is! —— NoEinstein ——

On Sep 21, 12:06***am, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
> Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:27:31 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net>
> > wrote:
>
> >>On Sep 18, 11:50 pm, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> >>>On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:26:32 -0800, doug <x...***xx.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>Dear Henri: ***Those who are 100% sure, probably aren't being objective
> >>in the analysis. ***—— NoEinstein ——
>
> > Every experiment that is supposed to support Einstein's relativity has an
> > alternative Newtonian solution.
>
> > Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> >www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm.
>
> > Einstein: greatest hoaxer since virgin mary
>
> Except of course those experiments which refute the ballistic theory you
> love but cannot support.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

PNG. PNG, PNG...

doug wrote:
> There is a century of evidence. However, you just put your fingers in
> your ears and refuse to listen. GPS etc are daily verifications of
> relativity but you either lie about what they are doing or claim the
> other experimenters are lying. There is no use in giving you the
> evidence you could look up for yourself. You refuse to give up
> your dreams.

GPS is evidence of it being wrong about "time changing" dingleberry.
Too bad you are too brainwashed and stupid to get such a fact.
LOL

doug wrote:
> Spaceman wrote:
>
>> doug wrote:
>>
>>> There is a century of evidence. However, you just put your fingers
>>> in your ears and refuse to listen. GPS etc are daily verifications
>>> of relativity but you either lie about what they are doing or claim
>>> the other experimenters are lying. There is no use in giving you
>>> the evidence you could look up for yourself. You refuse to give up
>>> your dreams.
>>
>>
>> GPS is evidence of it being wrong about "time changing" dingleberry.
>> Too bad you are too brainwashed and stupid to get such a fact.
>> LOL
>>
>
> Since GPS works perfectly, your clock theory must exactly reproduce
> relativity. In which case it is the same thing so you really should
> support relativity.

Silly doug.
He still does not get that all the math that supports time dilation
supports the clock malfunction theory and yet he is still too stupid
to realize that the physical cause is the clock malfunction, not
"time changing rate".
Silly Doug thinks decays rates are absolutes, even though a silly
atomic clock in motion proves they are not.
How stupid can Doug be.
If decay rates were truly absolutes, they would not change from
acceleration nor g-potential differences.
Doug is a brainwashed moron that can not grasp the most simple
facts about experimental data.
LOL

Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:13:35 -0800, doug <xx***xx.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:19:20 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFamily***gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
>
>>>>To Henri, science is deciding what name you'd like to be called.
>>>
>>>
>>>At least aether theory would work if an aether existed. SR is self refuting in
>>>many ways.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>You not liking it is not in any way a self refutation.
>>It has not been shown to make wrong predictions even though you
>>seem to believe that the world has been lying for a hundred years.
>
>
> There is absolutely NO evidence in support of SR.
>
There is a century of evidence. However, you just put your fingers in
your ears and refuse to listen. GPS etc are daily verifications of
relativity but you either lie about what they are doing or claim the
other experimenters are lying. There is no use in giving you the
evidence you could look up for yourself. You refuse to give up
your dreams.



>
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.