Shubee says...

>My goal is to remove from special relativity everything that is
>confused, unnecessary and not amenable to experimental verification.
>For example, I don't consider Lorentz coordinates to be as sacrosanct
>as Einstein believed they were. Or do you believe it's an
>indispensable requirement for physics teachers to use easily
>misunderstood oxymoronic phrases such "moving clocks run slow"?

Einstein didn't consider "Lorentz coordinates" to be sacrosanct.
He developed Special Relativity using inertial reference frames,
because physics is simpler in those frames. The Lorentz transformations
are only important because they relate coordinates in two different
inertial reference frames.

Einstein generalized his physics to arbitrary coordinate systems
in his General Relativity.

As for phrases such as "moving clocks run slow", that phrase
isn't used by physicists. It's only used in introductory discussions
of relativity. I agree that it is misleading, but so is the
opposite approach, which is to assume that relativity is nothing
but artifacts of using strangely synchronized clocks. Relativity
predicts that regardless of how you synchronize clocks:

Two clocks, A and B are initially at rest in some inertial
reference frame. Clock A remains at rest. Clock B moves off
at some large speed v, turns around, and comes back at speed
v (speeds measured relative to A). When they get back together,
we compare the elapsed times on clocks A and B. The prediction
of relativity is that
(elapsed time on B)/(elapsed time on A) = square-root(1-(v/c)^2).

--
Daryl McCullough
Ithaca, NY

On Jul 27, 4:31 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:

> Einstein didn't consider "Lorentz coordinates" to be sacrosanct.

Oh, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar did just that.
His intellect could not allow himself to assess the sacrosanctness of
what he had stolen anyway. <shrug>

> He developed Special Relativity using inertial reference frames,

Bullsh*t! Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar only
repeated what Poincare was saying.

> because physics is simpler in those frames.

Not necessarily.

> The Lorentz transformations
> are only important because they relate coordinates in two different
> inertial reference frames.

Bullsh*t! The Lorentz transform is believed to be true only because
it satisfies the principle of relativity which is BELIEVED to be
truth. <shrug>

> Einstein generalized his physics to arbitrary coordinate systems
> in his General Relativity.

Bullsh*t! The field equations can only be derived after Hilbert’s
Lagrangian is presented.

> As for phrases such as "moving clocks run slow", that phrase
> isn't used by physicists.

So, when do you get to speak for all the physicists aka priests of SR
and GR with Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar being
the messiah?

> It's only used in introductory discussions
> of relativity.

In another words, it is in place to confuse. <shrug>

> I agree that it is misleading, [...]

Realistically, the twin’s paradox kills the Lorentz transform, but
only the faithful zealous of SR BELIEVE IN the false resolutions where
each one so-called resolution is contradictory of the others.

I know you are so full of sh*t, Mr. McCullough. You are a fine final
product of the Orwellian educational system where:

** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** FAITH IS THEORY
** LYING IS TEACHING
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE

Now, how would you plead? Say the truth now that is ‘guilty’.

On Jul 27, 4:31 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:

> Einstein didn't consider "Lorentz coordinates" to be sacrosanct.

Oh, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar did just that.
His intellect could not allow himself to assess the sacrosanctness of
what he had stolen anyway. <shrug>

> He developed Special Relativity using inertial reference frames,

Bullsh*t! Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar only
repeated what Poincare was saying.

> because physics is simpler in those frames.

Not necessarily.

> The Lorentz transformations
> are only important because they relate coordinates in two different
> inertial reference frames.

Bullsh*t! The Lorentz transform is believed to be true only because
it satisfies the principle of relativity which is BELIEVED to be
truth. <shrug>

> Einstein generalized his physics to arbitrary coordinate systems
> in his General Relativity.

Bullsh*t! The field equations can only be derived after Hilbert’s
Lagrangian is presented.

> As for phrases such as "moving clocks run slow", that phrase
> isn't used by physicists.

So, when do you get to speak for all the physicists aka priests of SR
and GR with Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar being
the messiah?

> It's only used in introductory discussions
> of relativity.

In another words, it is in place to confuse. <shrug>

> I agree that it is misleading, [...]

Realistically, the twin’s paradox kills the Lorentz transform, but
only the faithful zealous of SR BELIEVE IN the false resolutions where
each one so-called resolution is contradictory of the others.

I know you are so full of sh*t, Mr. McCullough. You are a fine final
product of the Orwellian educational system where:

** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** FAITH IS THEORY
** LYING IS TEACHING
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE

Now, how would you plead? Say the truth now that is ‘guilty’.

On Jul 27, 4:31 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:

> Einstein didn't consider "Lorentz coordinates" to be sacrosanct.

Oh, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar did just that.
His intellect could not allow himself to assess the sacrosanctness of
what he had stolen anyway. <shrug>

> He developed Special Relativity using inertial reference frames,

Bullsh*t! Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar only
repeated what Poincare was saying.

> because physics is simpler in those frames.

Not necessarily.

> The Lorentz transformations
> are only important because they relate coordinates in two different
> inertial reference frames.

Bullsh*t! The Lorentz transform is believed to be true only because
it satisfies the principle of relativity which is BELIEVED to be
truth. <shrug>

> Einstein generalized his physics to arbitrary coordinate systems
> in his General Relativity.

Bullsh*t! The field equations can only be derived after Hilbert’s
Lagrangian is presented.

> As for phrases such as "moving clocks run slow", that phrase
> isn't used by physicists.

So, when do you get to speak for all the physicists aka priests of SR
and GR with Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar being
the messiah?

> It's only used in introductory discussions
> of relativity.

In another words, it is in place to confuse. <shrug>

> I agree that it is misleading, [...]

Realistically, the twin’s paradox kills the Lorentz transform, but
only the faithful zealous of SR BELIEVE IN the false resolutions where
each one so-called resolution is contradictory of the others.

I know you are so full of sh*t, Mr. McCullough. You are a fine final
product of the Orwellian educational system where:

** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** FAITH IS THEORY
** LYING IS TEACHING
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE

Now, how would you plead? Say the truth now that is ‘guilty’.