![]() |
| |||||||
| S'inscrire | FAQ | Membres | Calendrier | Recherche | Messages du jour | Marquer les forums comme lus |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Outils de la discussion | Modes d'affichage |
| |||
| On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:33:12 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1***mchsi.com> wrote: >Dr. Henri Wilson wrote: > >> >> Anti-Einstein articles will never be published in establishment run journals >> for the simple reason that too many eminent reputations would be destroyed as >> the truth emerged. > > Especially when the empirical data shows the articles > to be without merit. All experimental evidence points to light being 100% ballistic in a pure vacuum. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| |
![]() |
| Tags: peer, pentcho, publication, reviewed, valev |
| Outils de la discussion | |
| Modes d'affichage | |
| |
| ||||
| Discussion | Auteur | Forum | Réponses | Dernier message |
| Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication? | Dr. Henri Wilson | Newsgroup fr.sci.astrophysique | 0 | 25/07/2008 23h29 |
| Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication? | Dr. Henri Wilson | Newsgroup fr.sci.physique | 1 | 25/07/2008 10h41 |
| Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication? | Dr. Henri Wilson | Newsgroup fr.sci.astrophysique | 1 | 25/07/2008 10h41 |