![]() |
| |||||||
| S'inscrire | FAQ | Membres | Calendrier | Recherche | Messages du jour | Marquer les forums comme lus |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Outils de la discussion | Modes d'affichage |
| |||
| On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:11:11 -0700 (PDT), Talebun <pmparker6***btinternet.com> wrote: >On 24 Jul, 00:21, HW***....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:42:51 -0700 (PDT), Ian Parker <ianpark...***gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >Propose an alternative theory. It has to be one though that fits the >> >facts. >> >> All the facts clearly point to light being ballistic in pure vacuum... >> All arguments against the Ballistic nature of light have been shown to be >> flawed. >> >> Light moves at c wrt its source and c+v wrt an observer moving at v wrt the >> source. >> >I do which you learn a little Astronomy. I am in fact a student of the >subject. How can you ever see double stars? If light was ballistic >light from one stars would arrive months, or even years before that of >the other. I do wish you'd learn a little English. Light from orbiting stars initially leaves the source at c+vsint/T wrt Earth. However the conditions for multiple images are never reached because all light traveling in a particular direction tends towards the same speed, according to BaTh. Also, there is a hight degree of extinction in the near vicinity of a binary pair, the amount increasing with decreasing period (proximity). Just about all variable star curves can be produced using the c+v principle alone. For instance see: www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/group1.jpg Many binaries appear to involve a just star and a large planet or other cool object that reflects the star's light 180 out of phase, giving the appearance of two stars. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| |
| |||
| On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:29:10 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1***mchsi.com> wrote: >Dr. Henri Wilson wrote: > >> >> Light from orbiting stars initially leaves the source at c+vsint/T wrt Earth. >> > > <laughing> All right, I could have included another term u, denoting the speed of the binary barycentre wrt earth. I usually leave that out because it is obvious and doesn't affect brightness curves.. Do you still find this amusing, Wormey?...or do you think that all starlight is magically adjusted by the fairies to travel towards little planet Earth at precisely c? I might remind you that even Einstein accepted the notion of 'approaching speed' being other than c, as seen by a third observer. It is this approaching speed that creates brightness curves. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate. |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Tags: peer, pentcho, publication, reviewed, valev |
| Outils de la discussion | |
| Modes d'affichage | |
| |
| ||||
| Discussion | Auteur | Forum | Réponses | Dernier message |
| Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication? | Dr. Henri Wilson | Newsgroup fr.sci.physique | 0 | 25/07/2008 23h29 |
| Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication? | Dr. Henri Wilson | Newsgroup fr.sci.astrophysique | 0 | 25/07/2008 23h29 |
| Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication? | Dr. Henri Wilson | Newsgroup fr.sci.astrophysique | 1 | 25/07/2008 10h41 |