On 27 Jul, 12:49, NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 7:24***am, Ian Parker <ianpark...***gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Ian: ***Like others on the groups, you have the luxury of being a
> hard-sell. ***But being one of those isn't the same as being smart. ***Nor
> is the length of your replies evidence that you are smart. ***All those
> things show is that you are both obstinate and beyond reach. ***"Science
> truths are about the simple things." ***There is no need to escape into
> your threads and pasted trivia. ***— NoEinstein —
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 24 Jul, 00:25, NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net> wrote:> On Jul 20, 8:52***am, Ian Parker <ianpark...***gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Ian: ***You have been exposed to the trappings of 'science' enough
> > > to know some of the terminology and issues. ***But your reasoning
> > > ability is so small that you are incapable of differentiating a
> > > scientific truth from science fiction. ***Instead of letting the flawed
> > > reasoning of others substitute for your own "knowledge", you should
> > > take most of what has passed for... 'physics' with a grain of salt.
> > > Unless you do, you would be better off to find yourself another
> > > hobby. ***— NoEinstein —
>
> > It is you and your ilk that is pumping out SF
>
> >http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/
> > One you get beyond the glam pusses and Nazi propaganda there are some
> > very interesting articles.
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pi...ugmaschineFrom
> > Wikipaedia
>
> >http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/Th...s.htmAldebaron
> > (khayyid?)
>
> >http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/uf...foaleman_6.htm
> > 2000+km/h endurance 5½ hr was absolutely absurd.
>
> > I want a theory that explains to me why the orbit of Mercury
> > precesses, why pulsar pairs lose energy how light bends roung
> > gravitating objects. I would like to know too what quasars are.
>
> > Give me an alternative theory that fits the facts I am waiting for it.
>
> > Talebun has made a good point. Tell me how I can see double stars if
> > light travels relative to the source. I am waiting. I think we are all
> > waiting. Give me another theory.
>
> > I think you are following a long tradition of trying to rubbish people
> > and not putting forward real arguments which hold water.
>
> >http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...e_frm/thread/c...
> > Rand Simberg 112 you are vectored on this reference to 111.
>
> > This is absolutely the pits.
>
> > *** - Ian Parker- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I am putting my argements down in files and (if needed) post
continuously for 8 years. I am still looking for an alternative
theory.


- Ian Parker

On 27 Jul, 12:49, NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 7:24***am, Ian Parker <ianpark...***gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Ian: ***Like others on the groups, you have the luxury of being a
> hard-sell. ***But being one of those isn't the same as being smart. ***Nor
> is the length of your replies evidence that you are smart. ***All those
> things show is that you are both obstinate and beyond reach. ***"Science
> truths are about the simple things." ***There is no need to escape into
> your threads and pasted trivia. ***— NoEinstein —
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 24 Jul, 00:25, NoEinstein <noeinst...***bellsouth.net> wrote:> On Jul 20, 8:52***am, Ian Parker <ianpark...***gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Ian: ***You have been exposed to the trappings of 'science' enough
> > > to know some of the terminology and issues. ***But your reasoning
> > > ability is so small that you are incapable of differentiating a
> > > scientific truth from science fiction. ***Instead of letting the flawed
> > > reasoning of others substitute for your own "knowledge", you should
> > > take most of what has passed for... 'physics' with a grain of salt.
> > > Unless you do, you would be better off to find yourself another
> > > hobby. ***— NoEinstein —
>
> > It is you and your ilk that is pumping out SF
>
> >http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/
> > One you get beyond the glam pusses and Nazi propaganda there are some
> > very interesting articles.
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pi...ugmaschineFrom
> > Wikipaedia
>
> >http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/Th...s.htmAldebaron
> > (khayyid?)
>
> >http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/uf...foaleman_6.htm
> > 2000+km/h endurance 5½ hr was absolutely absurd.
>
> > I want a theory that explains to me why the orbit of Mercury
> > precesses, why pulsar pairs lose energy how light bends roung
> > gravitating objects. I would like to know too what quasars are.
>
> > Give me an alternative theory that fits the facts I am waiting for it.
>
> > Talebun has made a good point. Tell me how I can see double stars if
> > light travels relative to the source. I am waiting. I think we are all
> > waiting. Give me another theory.
>
> > I think you are following a long tradition of trying to rubbish people
> > and not putting forward real arguments which hold water.
>
> >http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...e_frm/thread/c...
> > Rand Simberg 112 you are vectored on this reference to 111.
>
> > This is absolutely the pits.
>
> > *** - Ian Parker- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I am putting my argements down in files and (if needed) post
continuously for 8 years. I am still looking for an alternative
theory.


- Ian Parker