On Aug 26, 8:19 am, "Mike Jr." <n00s...***comcast.net> wrote:

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Lie
>
> "The Big Lie is a propaganda technique. It was defined by Adolf
> Hitler
> in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so 'colossal' that no
> one would believe that someone 'could have the impudence to distort
> the truth so infamously'."

“Mein Kampf” contains no lies. It was a book written by a prisoner
with nothing better to do. Basically, the author whoever he was
(Hitler claimed he did it) was talking about nothing. There might be
subtle hints of what he was talking about, but the central theme was
washed down with garbage. It was a very, very f*cking boring book.
The analogy is to encode a piece of information with broadband. The
information is basically lost in a hay stack. Without the key, you
can interpret that book any way you like. Of course, you would choose
to do so to justify what you were told about World War Two. The only
thing that the history books got it right was which side won the war
and appropriately “built” the history to suit the current political
agenda. <shrug>




> It didn't work for Adolf either.

Yes, it never worked for Hitler. The enigma machine was already
compromised two years before Hitler came into power. The British had
already plotted the downfall of the Weimar Republic with or without
Hitler. On top of that, Hitler was so naïve that he did not know the
allies were all out to get him in the first place until several years
well into the war. The subtle hint was, of course, the Soviet
invasion of Poland.

If Hitler knew about the compromise of the enigma machine and purged
the traitor Admiral Canaris (equivalent of the head of CIA), the war
would be very much different. You are way too harsh in your judgment
just like embracing the SR crap. <shrug>

On 27 Aug, 07:04, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...***gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 8:19 am, "Mike Jr." <n00s...***comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Lie
>
> > "The Big Lie is a propaganda technique. It was defined by Adolf
> > Hitler
> > in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so 'colossal' that no
> > one would believe that someone 'could have the impudence to distort
> > the truth so infamously'."
>
> “Mein Kampf” contains no lies. ***It was a book written by a prisoner
> with nothing better to do. ***Basically, the author whoever he was
> (Hitler claimed he did it) was talking about nothing. ***There might be
> subtle hints of what he was talking about, but the central theme was
> washed down with garbage. ***It was a very, very f*cking boring book.
> The analogy is to encode a piece of information with broadband. ***The
> information is basically lost in a hay stack. ***Without the key, you
> can interpret that book any way you like. ***Of course, you would choose
> to do so to justify what you were told about World War Two. ***The only
> thing that the history books got it right was which side won the war
> and appropriately “built” the history to suit the current political
> agenda. ***<shrug>
>
> > It didn't work for Adolf either.
>
> Yes, it never worked for Hitler. ***The enigma machine was already
> compromised two years before Hitler came into power. ***The British had
> already plotted the downfall of the Weimar Republic with or without
> Hitler. ***On top of that, Hitler was so naïve that he did not know the
> allies were all out to get him in the first place until several years
> well into the war. ***The subtle hint was, of course, the Soviet
> invasion of Poland.
>
> If Hitler knew about the compromise of the enigma machine and purged
> the traitor Admiral Canaris (equivalent of the head of CIA), the war
> would be very much different. ***You are way too harsh in your judgment
> just like embracing the SR crap. ***<shrug>

Listen to me. If Deursche Phsik was all it was cracked up to be it
would have developed digital computers and the mathematical means of
breaking codes. It might have discovered RSA and the trapdoor codes.

BTW - Have the Atlanteans on Aldebaran proved the Riemann Hypothesis?
Can you factorise the product of 2 large primes (the basis of RSA)
faster than you can with Aitkin's algorithm?

I keep saying if there was anything in what you are saying, anything
at all, you would have done all these things.

Why was all the Thrird Reich's Uranium used for anti tank weapons? Why
was an atomic bomb not developed. One further point. The Nazis seemed
to lay great store by darwin. Why then is Deutsche Phsik so unfit?
Give me a proof of the Riemann hypothesis, or show me how to factorize
(esily) the product of 2 large primes and I might (just) listen.

Mike talks about the truth winning out in the end. Well Europe was in
ruins before the truth was established and it seems as if it is not
finally established even now.

Saddam was put into power by the CIA and was very much Nazi inspired.
The US removed him leaving 2.3 million lost souls wandering across the
Middle East. You will see the truth if you go to Syria - Established
in the end? It is a very expensive truth.


- Ian Parker