![]() |
| |||||||
| S'inscrire | FAQ | Membres | Calendrier | Recherche | Messages du jour | Marquer les forums comme lus |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Outils de la discussion | Modes d'affichage |
| |||
| On Aug 24, 2:55 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...***yahoo.com> wrote: > Future presidents should at least know how to trap a long train inside > a short tunnel: > > http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=nNgzqpKZwhE&feature=iv > Professor Richard A. Muller, University of California Berkeley > Physics for Future Presidents > > Pentcho Valev > pva...***yahoo.com <<Einstein published his theory of gravitation, or general theory of relativity, in 1916. And so a new paradigm, or set of beliefs, was established. It was not until 1930 that Fritz London explained the weak, attractive dipolar electric bonding force (known as Van der Waals’ dispersion force or the “London force”) that causes gas molecules to condense and form liquids and solids. Like gravity, the London force is always attractive and operates between electrically neutral molecules. And that precise property has been the most puzzling distinction between gravity and the powerful electromagnetic forces, which may repel as well as attract. So it seems the clue about the true nature of gravity has been available to chemists – who are not interested in gravity – and unavailable to physicists – who are not interested in physical chemistry (and view the world through Einstein’s distorting spectacles). Look at any average general physics textbook and you will find no reference to Van der Waals’ or London forces. What a different story might have been told if London’s insight had come a few decades earlier? Physics could, by now, have advanced by a century instead of being bogged in a mire of metaphysics. >> http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=r4k29syp Sue... |
| | ||||
| ||||
| |
![]() |
| Tags: future, physics, presidents |
| Outils de la discussion | |
| Modes d'affichage | |
| |