the sited paper was interesting, but hardly dyspositive
from my current skimming; can you "say,
what you think that it means?"

the idea of "instantaneous acceleration" is absurd, and
also a big waste of energy, a total conversion of mass,
the big crime of the wouldbejihadi -- all 98# of him or her (also
known
as "quantun teleportation to Paradise" .-)

> >>http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/dec252005/2009.pdf
> >> "On Einstein’s resolution of the twin clock paradox" by C.S.Lewis & H.R.Pufnstuf.

> > I freely admit that Einstein's resolution of the twin paradox was

thus:
horse****; one twin accelerates, presumably
so as to experience the "slowing of his clock,"
relative to the twin, who stayed at the F-type planet, or
"time dilation;" you are being supercilious!

> frames. But your "carried by a traveler" suggests you
> probably have something else in mind, such as a twin
> scenario. Note that the twin scenario does NOT display
> "time dilation", it displays a difference in elapsed
> proper times for clocks that travel on different paths.

thus:
I don't get it; I finally unscrolled the end of your paper,
to find the usual 1D Lorentz thingy, applicable
to dilation of relative time, mass etc.; so, What?

> Shubeehttp://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf

thus:
the obvious problem with the "rubber snake wave power" would
be the one that all sea-going ships face, even
in the wet-dock.

--Welome to the Cheenysphere --
your 24/7/51 channel for everyhting that can be known, and
lots of speculation, about Trickier Dick
form the Nixon Admin. ..."You mean,
Dick was doing his magic, then, two?"
yeah, but *what* he & Rumfseld were doing,
seems to be a national security matter.
http://larouchepub.com